Thrown under the train. That best describes what the California High Speed Rail (CHSR) system’s proposed A-3 route does to Madera County agriculture and the public water agencies delivering water to County farms. Nowhere else anywhere along any part of the CHSR route, from San Diego to Sacramento and across the valley going into the Bay area, are agricultural lands and the water agencies that serve them impacted anywhere near as severely or as extensively as they are in Madera County.
Moreover, reviewing the proposed CHSR route presented to voters as Proposition 1A in November 2008, it’s clear Madera County voters, if not Madera County’s elected officials, were sold a “bill of goods” by rail proponents. Maps of the then-proposed route show the CHSR traversing the County north to south adjacent to the existing railroad right-of-way, the A-2 Route, which would have minimal, not entirely unreasonable, impacts to county farms and water delivery systems.
For Madera Irrigation District and the growers we serve, the impacts of the A-3 route will be substantial and include:
+ Severing and requiring piece meal alteration and/or reconstruction of nearly every District canal and pipeline water delivery system and facilities rights-of-way west of Highway 99,
+ Higher water rates and land based charges due to:
1. Increased operating costs resulting from the inability of District staff and equipment to travel directly and efficiently (you can’t get there from here) between work sites and while operating water delivery systems,
2. A greater number of District staff and vehicles being required to complete time critical tasks due to travel problems noted above,
3. Lower revenues due to reduced land based assessments as lands are taken out of production for the HSRS route and/or become economically unviable after being carved into small disconnected parcels, and
4. Fewer acres being farmed to repay obligations for the construction of federal and district water delivery and storage facilities.
Obviously there are no “upsides” and far too many downsides to the Madera Irrigation District and the farmers we serve. And looking at the route maps, I can’t imagine the situation is any different in other areas of the county. Which raises the question: How did the A-3 route become the preferred alternative, especially given that purported problems and issues associated with the A-2 route through Madera County and City of Madera are, arguably at least, little or no different than those encountered traversing any other county or community in the valley?
CHSR officials and consultants at the Dec. 18 CHSR public workshop were long on hyperbole about how terrific HSR will be but short on explanations as to their rationale for proposing to decimate Madera County agriculture. In short all they and the presented materials admitted was that the impact to Madera County agriculture would be “high,” a profound understatement.
If there is anything positive to be said at this juncture it is that there is still, or at least should be, a lengthy open public process required before the final decision on routing is supposed to be made. During that process it is of paramount importance that farmers and landowners express their views in writing to the High Speed Rail Authority and to their elected representatives at both local and state levels.
This can begin by attending and expressing your views at the Madera County Board of Supervisors meeting scheduled for 9 a.m. Tuesday, Jan. 5, at which Supervisor Bigelow is reportedly going to introduce a declaration calling for any CHSR alignment to be within existing rail corridors.
Letting our concerns be known, we can at least hope to prevent Madera County agriculture from being thrown under the CHSR train.
Lance W. Johnson,
general manager of Madera Irrigation District